Резервирование L2 — различия между версиями

Материал из wiki
Перейти к: навигация, поиск
(BFD)
Строка 4: Строка 4:
 
=UDLD=
 
=UDLD=
 
=BFD=
 
=BFD=
 
+
=Fate Sharing=
 +
The underlying assumption is simple: if the routing protocol manages to exchange information between adjacent nodes, there won’t be any problems with the user traffic. Furthermore, if the routing protocol updates in a distance vector protocol made it from egress router to ingress router, the traffic should experience no problems when being sent in the reverse direction.
 +
http://blog.ipspace.net/2014/08/fate-sharing-in-ip-networks.html
 
[[категория:Лекции]]  
 
[[категория:Лекции]]  
 
[[Категория:Сети]]
 
[[Категория:Сети]]
 
[[Category:Cisco]] [[Category:NAT]]
 
[[Category:Cisco]] [[Category:NAT]]

Версия 06:31, 21 октября 2014

LAG

LAcP

MLAG

UDLD

BFD

Fate Sharing

The underlying assumption is simple: if the routing protocol manages to exchange information between adjacent nodes, there won’t be any problems with the user traffic. Furthermore, if the routing protocol updates in a distance vector protocol made it from egress router to ingress router, the traffic should experience no problems when being sent in the reverse direction. http://blog.ipspace.net/2014/08/fate-sharing-in-ip-networks.html